Log in

No account? Create an account

The Practice of... not practicing

« previous entry | next entry »
Dec. 26th, 2004 | 05:59 am
mood: blankblank

I can identify with this avoidance of a Practice, somewhat, although in a way I have not completely examined.

What I find greater or more attractive in a person is either of:

A. sticking with (training for, focusing on) a skill to the point of excellence
B. putting just a little extra energy into any, each, and EVERY little thing that you have a scrap of natural talent for.

I encourage people to go with A, because it has a bigger payoff for most people and is perhaps more normal, or at least traditional. And admirable.

I am unabashedly guilty of B in my own life, but I feel it's what comes naturally to me. Makes me look like a Renaissance Man, when in reality I'm just coping with my neural landscape. I can know one or two things about everything far more easily than a bunch of things about one thing. I am a professional generalist.

As far as judging what's healthy for you, no one can say -- unless they ask you and you tell them and they tell it back to you, which is what therapists do -- but I will throw my moral/ethical/religious/worldview/philosophy two cents in here and say if it enhances your experience in this life and doesn't take away from anyone else's, it's healthy.

cross-posted from another thread

The astute reader may correctly suspect that I'm going to contradict myself on this later. But I keep pressing these keys with letters on them and I like the way they click, so

Link | Leave a comment |

Comments {7}


I know what I know if ya know what I mean.

from: troyworks
date: Dec. 27th, 2004 09:47 am (UTC)

I'm always impressed by excellence. It's a turn on if anything in areas I aspire to and admired even when I find the excellence in something I find reprehensible.

A is what I strive for. Something like B is what my neural landscape affords me as well. I'm always going for good enough,..next thing, cause I get bored. I give the impression of being a renaissance man but that isn't the case either. I don't know much about history, or current poltics/art, etc. I'm a specialized generalist or a generalized specialist or something like that.

Reply | Thread