Triple Entendre (triple_entendre) wrote,
Triple Entendre

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Recommended: "WorldChanging: Models, Tools, and Ideas for Building a Bright Green Future"

You can add the worldchanging2 feed to your friends list to get updates for
Really fascinating, world-changing stuff, with well-written summaries and links to contextual information.

What is Worldchanging? works from a simple premise: that the tools, models and ideas for building a better future lie all around us. That plenty of people are working on tools for change, but the fields in which they work remain unconnected. That the motive, means and opportunity for profound positive change are already present. That another world is not just possible, it's here. We only need to put the pieces together.

"A toolkit for changing the world." I am so down with this. And it's tasty reading. Rock on!

Their "contributors' guidelines" are also good advice for blog-style journaling:
1) only positive recommendations. It's fine to review a tool which is itself critical or negative, but only if it offers something unique and useful to people working on that problem (or seeking to understand it). For example, Alex plans to review a book which describes the anatomy of failure – why things fail, and how – because its critical insights are really useful to people who want to succeed in their work. But the recommendation of the resource itself should be positive, overall: otherwise, why are we wasting the reader's time?

2) always a fresh angle. The resource reviewed should be either new (or newly-available), or the recommendation should explain why we're recommending this resource *now*: has there been a news event which this resource helps to better explain, or is an inferior new resource getting a lot of buzz (such that readers would be well-reminded of the existence of this older, superior one?)

3) Pithy Writing. Write short and strong. In general, while we like to prattle on (especially Alex), we aim for short recommendations, no more than three paragraphs(some things take longer to explain, and sometimes you'll want to review several related items in one recommendation, but the denser and pithier the writing, the better). Try to start with a strong, declarative first sentence.

4) Excerpts. Including a few quotes from the resource recommended is a great idea. We italicize all stand-alone quotes, as well as putting in quotation marks. If you have a longer excerpt, you might think about pasting most of it into the "extended entry" box, which allows those who are interested to read more, while keeping the front page tight. A good guideline for choosing excerpts is that of the old Whole Earth Review, which is that a great excerpt illustrates the nature of the resource you're recommending and also provides an interesting thought or crucial bit of information for the casual reader who won't follow the link. Cherry-pick, in other words: pull the best quotes from the resource as excerpts in your recommendation.

5) Why It Matters. It's a good idea to include not only a description of what the resource is but also some explanation about why it matters: Why is it good? How is it useful? How do you use it? What's innovative about it? What are the implications if its use were to spread? Feel free to be opinionated!

Tags: blog, recommended

  • Make LJ Great Again

    If I were to do some long-form writing again, what kinds of things would you be curious to read?

  • Flipside 2015: The Flood

    I attended this year's Flipside. I had a great time! I was one of the people stranded there by floodwaters for an extra day. The community handled…

  • Who do I know in CA?

    California/East Bay Area, I am in you! I'll be in the area for a couple of weeks. Who do I know that still lives around here?

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.